<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>Erez,<BR>
<BR>
I'm terribly sorry that this is taking me so long. I am having problems reproducing the bug in a reliable way for the first time. Ironic really. The only time I manage to make it work is the one time I am trying to break it. <BR>
<BR>
I'll keep you posted.<BR>
<BR>
John<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>
<HR id=stopSpelling>
<BR>
> Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 19:35:40 -0500<BR>> From: ezk@cs.sunysb.edu<BR>> To: junx_dk@hotmail.com<BR>> Subject: Re: [Unionfs] Possible timestamp related problem. <BR>> CC: ezk@cs.sunysb.edu; unionfs@fsl.cs.sunysb.edu<BR>> <BR>> In message <BAY108-W3894A751FF8A8C346DBF81966A0@phx.gbl>, John Nielsen writes:<BR>> <BR>> > Erez,<BR>> > I'm sorry to report that your patch didnt work. I applied it to<BR>> > unionfs-2.1.10 and also tried unionfs-2.1.11. It appeared that the patch<BR>> > was already applied to this version however. Neither versions solved my<BR>> > problem.<BR>> > <BR>> > Were you able to reproduce the issue yourself?<BR>> <BR>> Sorry, no. I tried everything I could to simulate your env, and several<BR>> variations too, but I couldn't reproduce it. Any chance I can get temp<BR>> remote access to your system? Since you're able to reproduce this reliably,<BR>> that'd help a lot (my experience is that reproducing a kernel bug is >80% of<BR>> the fix!)<BR>> <BR>> > Kind regards,<BR>> ><BR>> > John<BR>> <BR>> Thanks,<BR>> Erez.<BR>> _______________________________________________<BR>> unionfs mailing list: http://unionfs.filesystems.org/<BR>> unionfs@mail.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu<BR>> http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs<BR><BR><br /><hr />Hent den nye Windows Live Messenger! <a href='www.windowslive.dk/suite' target='_new'>Prøv det!</a></body>
</html>