<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div style="text-align: left;">Thank you Erez.<br><br>I will see about getting you access.<br><br>I will let you know as soon as possible.<br><br>Kind regards,<br><br>John<br></div><br><br><br><hr id="stopSpelling">> Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 19:35:40 -0500<br>> From: ezk@cs.sunysb.edu<br>> To: junx_dk@hotmail.com<br>> Subject: Re: [Unionfs] Possible timestamp related problem. <br>> CC: ezk@cs.sunysb.edu; unionfs@fsl.cs.sunysb.edu<br>> <br>> In message <BAY108-W3894A751FF8A8C346DBF81966A0@phx.gbl>, John Nielsen writes:<br>> <br>> > Erez,<br>> > I'm sorry to report that your patch didnt work. I applied it to<br>> > unionfs-2.1.10 and also tried unionfs-2.1.11. It appeared that the patch<br>> > was already applied to this version however. Neither versions solved my<br>> > problem.<br>> > <br>> > Were you able to reproduce the issue yourself?<br>> <br>> Sorry, no. I tried everything I could to simulate your env, and several<br>> variations too, but I couldn't reproduce it. Any chance I can get temp<br>> remote access to your system? Since you're able to reproduce this reliably,<br>> that'd help a lot (my experience is that reproducing a kernel bug is >80% of<br>> the fix!)<br>> <br>> > Kind regards,<br>> ><br>> > John<br>> <br>> Thanks,<br>> Erez.<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> unionfs mailing list: http://unionfs.filesystems.org/<br>> unionfs@mail.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu<br>> http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs<br><br /><hr />Hent den nye Windows Live Messenger! <a href='www.windowslive.dk/suite' target='_new'>Prøv det!</a></body>
</html>