[Unionfs] Possible timestamp related problem.

[John Nielsen]

Erez,
 
I'm terribly sorry that this is taking me so long. I am having problems reproducing the bug in a reliable way for the first time. Ironic really. The only time I manage to make it work is the one time I am trying to break it. 
 
I'll keep you posted.
 
John



> Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 19:35:40 -0500> From: ezk at cs.sunysb.edu> To: junx_dk at hotmail.com> Subject: Re: [Unionfs] Possible timestamp related problem. > CC: ezk at cs.sunysb.edu; unionfs at fsl.cs.sunysb.edu> > In message <BAY108-W3894A751FF8A8C346DBF81966A0 at phx.gbl>, John Nielsen writes:> > > Erez,> > I'm sorry to report that your patch didnt work. I applied it to> > unionfs-2.1.10 and also tried unionfs-2.1.11. It appeared that the patch> > was already applied to this version however. Neither versions solved my> > problem.> > > > Were you able to reproduce the issue yourself?> > Sorry, no. I tried everything I could to simulate your env, and several> variations too, but I couldn't reproduce it. Any chance I can get temp> remote access to your system? Since you're able to reproduce this reliably,> that'd help a lot (my experience is that reproducing a kernel bug is >80% of> the fix!)> > > Kind regards,> >> > John> > Thanks,> Erez.> _______________________________________________> unionfs mailing list: http://unionfs.filesystems.org/> unionfs at mail.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu> http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
_________________________________________________________________
Saml dine online aktiviteter på din PC med Windows Live
www.windowslive.dk/suite
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/pipermail/unionfs/attachments/20071211/d81819e1/attachment-0001.htm