[Unionfs] Possible timestamp related problem.

[John Nielsen]

Thank you Erez.

I will see about getting you access.

I will let you know as soon as possible.

Kind regards,

John



> Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 19:35:40 -0500
> From: ezk at cs.sunysb.edu
> To: junx_dk at hotmail.com
> Subject: Re: [Unionfs] Possible timestamp related problem. 
> CC: ezk at cs.sunysb.edu; unionfs at fsl.cs.sunysb.edu
> 
> In message <BAY108-W3894A751FF8A8C346DBF81966A0 at phx.gbl>, John Nielsen writes:
> 
> > Erez,
> > I'm sorry to report that your patch didnt work. I applied it to
> > unionfs-2.1.10 and also tried unionfs-2.1.11. It appeared that the patch
> > was already applied to this version however. Neither versions solved my
> > problem.
> > 
> > Were you able to reproduce the issue yourself?
> 
> Sorry, no.  I tried everything I could to simulate your env, and several
> variations too, but I couldn't reproduce it.  Any chance I can get temp
> remote access to your system?  Since you're able to reproduce this reliably,
> that'd help a lot (my experience is that reproducing a kernel bug is >80% of
> the fix!)
> 
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > John
> 
> Thanks,
> Erez.
> _______________________________________________
> unionfs mailing list: http://unionfs.filesystems.org/
> unionfs at mail.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu
> http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs

_________________________________________________________________
Saml dine online aktiviteter på din PC med Windows Live
www.windowslive.dk/suite
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/pipermail/unionfs/attachments/20071210/a9fa6e06/attachment.htm